The sports industry is such a beast. There are the games themselves. There are the televised and radio broadcasting of those games. Then there are the advertisements attached to the broadcasting. Each top athlete seems also to have his or her own agent, brand of a product (cologne, sneakers, sports drink), charity of choice, and bobblehead doll. Teams are allowed x number of players, but employee in the thousands in marketing and sales and general management.
Then there is sports journalism. Each radio market has at least one AM station devoted to sports talk radio. There are so many sports websites it would be futile to count. Each newspaper and network devotes sections and times to sports. Then there are the GM and Ford of sports journalism: ESPN and Sports Illustrated.
And what happens? We as a society place these athletes onto a pedestal. They are sometimes given carte blanche to do what they wish and to say and act as children. And we allow it.
Sometimes, we encourage it.
Take tomorrow's announcement for example. Tomorrow the 2007 class of the Baseball Hall of Fame will be announced. Likely only two candidates will make it (Cal Ripken, Jr. and Tony Gwynn). What we will also see, however, is how many writers have voted for Mark McGwire.
Yes,
that Mark McGwire. The excuses to vote for him are already written. Two ESPN writers,
Jim Caple and
Bill Simmons, have stated their cases here. I've narrowed the excuses to vote for McGwire -- and other steroid users -- down to three.
1) He played in the steroid era when other players did it. In that context, look at how he performed. In the case of McGwire, 583 home runs, including the first player to 70 in 1998, a Rookie-of-the-Year award, a gold glove, 4 HR titles, 1 RBI title and that awesome summer in 1998.
2) He was never found guilty of anything. Unlike Rafael Palmeiro, who was caught, McGwire never admitted to nor tested positive for anything. In a society where our courts say innocent until proven guilty, he should be treated as such.
3) Other individuals already in the Hall of Fame had done as bad, if not worse, to baseball. Ty Cobb, for instance, was racist, extremely violent and was once suspended for throwing a ballgame. Gaylord Perry admittedly threw illegal pitches. If they are in Cooperstown, McGwire belongs as well.
Now, here are my answers to these excuses:
1) Mark McGwire, by taking steroids, cheated. He gave himself and unfair -- and illegal -- edge that not only puts a damper on that marvelous season (McGwire, by the way, was not the only story of that year. I recall Sammy Sosa being an equal part of that HR chase. There was also that incredible Yankee team that went 125-50 with no players hitting more than 28 home runs.) but also puts a black mark on one of the game's greatest records. And in an era where, for whatever reason, balls fly out of ball parks with alarming regularity, his home run totals are not nearly as impressive, especially considering he wasn't a contact hitter or stolen base threat or anything else.
2) Mark McGwire was never put on trial for anything. This isn't judicial court here, it's the court of public opinion. And we know that what happens in court isn't necessarily what really happened (see OJ Simpson). Mark McGwire cheated. We learned this when he spoke in front of the Senate. Read this article from Tom Verducci in
Sports Illustrated. Do you really believe he isn't guilty?
3) This is, to me, the most offensive of excuses. What happened in the past does not justify a decision in the present or the future. There are Hall members that aren't worthy because of their actions. For whatever reason, they were elected anyway. This was a bad decision. Justifying a vote for McGwire because of this is justifying bad decisions. Worse, it justifies bad behavior.
Sports writers have an opportunity with McGwire and others to make a statement that athlete's behavior is as important as their performance. Wherever writers may have failed before with this is irrelevant. Allowing a McGwire (or a Sosa, or a Canseco, or a Bonds) into the Hall of Fame is the same as saying that athletes are on a pedestal, that they are somehow impervious to the rules that govern the rest of us.
It's an irresponsible decision to vote for Mark McGwire.